Florida Hellthcare

Attorney Practice Survey

Research and analysis byTravis Brett CreightonFounder and principal researcher, Florida Hellthcare

Attorney research

Florida § 768.21(8) practice survey

This approximately five-minute survey examines what, if any, medical-negligence death claims reach court when § 768.21(8) limits survivor damages. It requests no client names, privileged communications, medical records, or case-identifying facts.

Attorney verification is optional. Identity and contact information are stored separately from published research and will not be attributed without express permission.

Optional attorney verification

Enter your Florida Bar number to receive a verification email at the address in the imported Florida Bar directory record. The message provides both a one-click link and a six-digit code. You may continue the survey without verifying.

Verification is optional. You may continue without it.

Practice background
Most recent five completed calendar years

Use reasonable ranges. Select “Not tracked or cannot estimate” when records do not support an estimate.

Economic and legal effect
In your experience, how often does § 768.21(8) materially affect whether an otherwise plausible matter is accepted?
Which factors commonly affect the decision not to pursue such a matter? Select all that apply.
Would repeal of § 768.21(8) affect your willingness to investigate or accept some Florida medical-negligence death matters?

Do not include client names, case numbers, privileged information, or facts that would identify a client or prospective client.

Research and follow-up permissions
May an anonymous excerpt from your written response be quoted?
May Florida Hellthcare contact you for clarification or a follow-up interview?
If attribution is ever considered, what should happen?