Damages exclusion
Section 768.21(8) removes specified wrongful-death noneconomic damages from adult children and parents of adult children in medical-negligence cases.
Florida law • family loss • public accountability
Florida law allows some families to recover for mental pain and suffering after a wrongful death—then removes those damages from specified adult-family survivors when the claim is medical negligence. A separate statute of repose can close the courthouse door with time alone.
The issue in plain English
The disputed classification turns on the cause of death and the survivor’s family relationship—not on whether negligence can be proven.
Florida’s Wrongful Death Act can permit adult children, when there is no surviving spouse, and qualifying parents of an adult child to seek specified noneconomic damages.
Section 768.21(8) removes those specified mental-pain-and-suffering and companionship damages for the same classes of adult-family survivors.
Three connected barriers
Section 768.21(8) removes specified wrongful-death noneconomic damages from adult children and parents of adult children in medical-negligence cases.
Chapter 766 ordinarily requires investigation and corroboration before suit. When the principal damages are unavailable, experts and counsel may be economically unobtainable.
Section 95.11 imposes an outside time limit that can extinguish a medical-malpractice action even before a claimant discovers enough to pursue it, subject to limited statutory exceptions.
The researcher behind the record
Travis began this work after losing both parents to care he believes involved medical negligence. His investigation of his mother Jeraldine Ann Creighton’s death expanded into an independent reconstruction of Florida’s medical-malpractice wrongful-death and repose history.
He is the founder and principal researcher of Florida Hellthcare. Journalists, attorneys, scholars, and policymakers seeking to understand this research or the family experience behind it are invited to contact him directly.
Why this site exists
After losing both of my parents to care I believe involved medical negligence, I learned that the merits were not the only threshold question. Family status, expert costs, procedural rules, and absolute time bars could determine whether any court would ever hear the evidence.
Read the story and methodA documented public record
This project follows the statute from the 1972 Wrongful Death Act and the 1975 malpractice reforms, through the 1990 exclusion, the decisions in Carr, Mizrahi, McCall, Kalitan, and Santiago, and the 2025 veto and 2026 session.
Follow the timelineUse the work
Understand the classification, preserve records, and share an experience without publishing private medical information.
Review statutes, cases, bill histories, constitutional questions, and the developing repose research.
Trace what was enacted, what courts relied on, what changed, and what repeal efforts actually did.
Project updates
This project is strongest when every historical and constitutional proposition is treated as testable. Attorneys, insurance historians, actuaries, health-policy researchers, archivists, journalists, and medical […]
“Florida Free Kill” is effective advocacy language, but precision makes the argument stronger. Section 768.21(8) does not authorize killing and does not erase every […]
Section 768.21(8) remains Florida law. HB 6003, the 2026 clean-repeal bill, died in Senate Rules on March 13, 2026. Identical SB 1700 died in […]